Many restauranteurs would probably argue that pictures on a menu are just an outright abomination to the profession (Gordon Ramsey, for one). You don’t see any upscale restaurants with pictures on their menu, just a detailed description of the dish. To be sure, pictures on menus are reminiscent of fast food joints.
“I’ll take the combo #2, super-sized.” No description needed, the picture says it all.
“mmphogclakm zpechtorflam” is the reply from the speaker (that means “pull up” in drive-thru speak).
Is it a sin to have pictures on a menu? Any one of us can probably recall off the top of our head at least five restaurants we’ve been to with pictures on the menu (let’s see: Chili’s, Denny’s, Red Robin…hmm, all franchises – interesting). Do these restaurants know something that other restauranteurs don’t? I would venture to say that restaurants actually sell more of the pictured items, but I haven’t seen any data on this. Let me tell you what I think.
We’ve all heard the phrase “A picture is worth a thousand words.” Its one thing for me to tell you about the fantastic lunch I experienced the other day at Frida’s. But its quite another for me to actually show you what I ate. Since you cannot smell nor taste what I am describing, you have to rely on your brain’s previous connections and my excellent verbal skills to “virtually” taste the food. This is pretty difficult to do. However, when I throw a picture into the mix, allowing you to see presentation, color, and shape, its much easier for your brain to comprehend. Now we’re combining two of the senses: “Wow, that sounds delicious,” and “Oooh, that looks really good!”
I watched a show recently on Ferran Adria, who runs El Bulli in Spain, who photographically documents every single thing created in his kitchen (more like a lab, really). There are excellent pictures of his work at Chez Pim’s blog.
Adam Robert at The Amateur Gourmet has an excellent post on writing a food blog. One of his recommendations is to get a camera, reasoning that you can see food before you taste it and is, therefore, an integral part of blogging (or writing) about food. Isn’t a menu considered writing about food?
I’m certainly no expert in this, but I’m sure there are right and wrong ways to do this:
- The picture needs to be professional. Plate it well, light it properly, and take the best picture possible. There’s nothing worse than pictures that show sloppy plating or a messy tablecloth. If you can’t take professional photos yourself, don’t do it.
- Don’t put a picture of everything on your menu as it will dilute the effectiveness of what you are trying to convey. A picture of just one of the burgers should be enough.
- It better look like the picture when I get it. Everyone knows that the Big Mac on the menu board won’t actually look like the smashed sandwich you get in the wrapper. However, don’t make this a practice at your establishment.
- Your menu is your salesperson. Don’t skimp on doing this right and hire someone if you have to.
- Do put a picture of your specialty. This is what you are known for and you want to sell more of it, right?
- Don’t use the car ad disclaimer: “Artwork for representational purposes only.”
I’m sure there are a few others and I’d like to hear them.
So, again I ask: is it a sin to put pictures on a menu? As long as its done right, I think not. In fact, it could revolutionize your business through increased sales.


Franchises tend to have pictures on their menus so that customers that are not able to read can see what they are ordering. I have worked with two men in their late 40s who have a hard time reading. They tend to only go to restaurants with pictures on their menus.
I like to see a few pictures, especially if it is something most people may have not heard of before, on the menu.